This is a free copy of Virtual Server 2005 Enterprise Edition for all TechEd 2005 Europe attenees.

You can get the details at this link.

Friday, June 10, 2005 3:20:25 PM UTC |  | Disclaimer | Comments [0] | 

Richard Godfrey has blogged an interesting post on “Is it legal to be an 'Architect'?”, in the context of the title of ‘Architect’ being protected by English Law.

It seems the UK act in question is Architects Act 1997, with some guidance on its use can be found at this link

As pointed out by Richard, the Architects Registration Board (http://www.arb.org.uk), have commented on the use of architect in the ICT industry.

“In particular, the Board is aware of widespread use within the computer and IT industry of the word “architect” being incorporated into certain job descriptions, eg. “Systems Architect” or “Software Architect”. While such use may be a technical breach of the Act, the reason for and intention of continued regulation of title is principally to ensure that consumers of architects’ services are guaranteed a certain standard and quality of work.

It was never the intention of the Act to regulate the title for its own sake. The Board therefore takes a pragmatic view, and accepts that the use of the word “architect” causes no concern when used in a context which is clearly not related to the design and construction of buildings.”

I wonder is there such a law on the Irish statute books, probably not, phew!!  

Maybe I should cut back on using buildings as analogies, just to be on the safe side

or maybe on second thought……

What would be useful, is a more formalised way to define the architect moniker and better establish the taxonomy, as it is a widely used term and perhaps establishing a better definition of the word architect and how it related to the design and construction of Buildings systems, would clean up the huge variety of roles and the many defintions (for Enterprise, Solution, System, Application, Software and Technical architect). Certainly the upcoming certified architect programme, especially with its strucuture/process being close to that of a PhD board, is a huge leap in the right direction. I have always had great admiration for certain certifications in the industry, such as the Cisco’s CCNA, CCNP and CCIE, these are ultra hard to get and you earn your strips with them.

Friday, June 10, 2005 1:24:59 PM UTC |  | Disclaimer | Comments [0] | 

Hi All,

        As blogged by Damien, at the next NIMTUG meeting (Monday 20th June) we are going to cover Indigo. For more information and to register for the talk please visit http://nimtug.org/20-june-2005.aspx. If you're not a member you'll have to join first before registering for the talk. Membership and registration for the talks are free & there's social gathering after the talk with some food & drink.

If you have any special areas of Indigo you would  like covered, please feel free to place a comment below or shot me an email at paul at paulfallon.com.

Hope to see you there,

– Paul

Thursday, June 09, 2005 8:03:55 PM UTC |  | Disclaimer | Comments [0] | 

via Scott Woodgate – Lead Product Manager for BTS 

on his blog, he has just posted an entry on a new whitepaper that helps to better understand  Microsoft's Integration Technologies.

<extract>

This whitepaper is a collaborative effort between members of the MSMQ, "Indigo", SQL SSIS, SQL SSB, SQL Replication, Host Integration Server and BizTalk Server teams.  The whitepaper describes the core use-cases for these technologies and when to use which technology.  Accompanying this whitepaper are the TechEd session which I delivered this week and will be on the TechEd DVD.

This paper will be posted to the SQL, BTS MSDN dev centers in due course.  If you want it now then go to groups.msn.com and join the biztalkserverstuff group and then download the file from here (otherwise you will get a download error). ………………….

</extract>

The blog entry can can be found at this link

– Paul

Wednesday, June 08, 2005 11:08:15 PM UTC |  | Disclaimer | Comments [0] | 

I’m a bit late with this one, apologies if you have seen it already.

Scott Woodgate – Lead Product Manager for BTS  –  last month did a short 15 mins MSDN TV recording on Biztalk and Indigo.

You can view the video here and see the transcript at this link.

Rgds,

P.

Wednesday, June 08, 2005 11:04:18 PM UTC |  | Disclaimer | Comments [0] | 

While watching the TechEd Keynote, there were lots of very interesting demos etc.. but one of the things that perhaps may have been a bit of a shock was the demo where they ran Windows on Sun tin.

It was over a year ago that Sun started to put their kit through some of the WHQL (Windows hardware Quality Labs) compatibility tests. I found this link, that references some of the testing that was taking place back in April of last year. Interesting stuff, as far as I can recall, I think this is the first time that its been demoed by either party.

– Paul

Wednesday, June 08, 2005 12:26:52 PM UTC |  | Disclaimer | Comments [0] | 

Hi all,

          I just saw that Joe has kicked off a event reminder (to all registered members of INDA) for the Indigo Session in Cork ( the European Capital of Culture) , on the 29th of June at the National Software Center in Cork, at 6pm.

Just in case there are folks not registered yet, I thought I would blog a reminder also.

You can register at this link, http://www.developers.ie/session.aspx?s=12

Hope to see you all there,

Regards,

Paul

ps

if there any particular topics areas you would like covered, by all means drop a comment below or shot me an email.

Wednesday, June 08, 2005 11:13:37 AM UTC |  | Disclaimer | Comments [0] | 

Well its a little earlier than I thought, but it seems that we will have quad cores from both AMD (http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=23747) and Intel (http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=23748) by Q1 of next year.

Extremely interesting! So, at a guess this means that by this time next year we will have a min. of 20%+ adoption across customers in the market with dual core and low single digit with Quad, which is excellent stuff. And lets not forget the adoption of 64bit! and also that the Whidbey wave can target both x64 and I64 (with RTM in early Nov this year), which means the Fx, SQL2005 and BTS2006 and going forward, so will Indigo and many more coming products/technologies in the pipeline.

Wow, very interesting times indeed. and this is not even mentioning all of the Virtualisation technology coming the pipline in the next 12–24 months.

For example, there is
– the new Beta of SP1 for Vitual Server 2005, which will offer 64bit hosts for 32bit guests, plus much more
– Windows hypervisor (see this ZDNET article that covers some of the announcements/discussions at TechEd this week)
– AMD’s “Pacifica” virtualisation extensions
     – which seems to be focused as an architectural piece/play across the AMD64 product lines (AFAIK).
– Intel’s VT extenstions ( AFAIK, these timelines and packagings are correct)
     – Lyndon coming for the desktop P4 in 2005
     – Averill coming for the desktop P4 in 2006
     – Mobile dual core processor code-named “Yonah” coming in 2006
     – Millington / DP Montvale coming for the DP (dual proc) IPF/Itanium product line in ‘05/’06
     – and in 2006, there will Bensley and Glidewell for the DP Xeon product lines

Hey, lots of things to keep up with!

HTH,

Paul

Wednesday, June 08, 2005 9:29:07 AM UTC |  | Disclaimer | Comments [0] | 

A webcast of Steve Ballmer’s Tech·Ed 2005 Keynote: "Delivering New Value to the Business" can be found here

Tuesday, June 07, 2005 7:18:30 PM UTC |  | Disclaimer | Comments [3] | 

PDC '05  registration is open!

plus more details on the sessions have been published, such as for communications for example, there will be:

<extract>
Communications

• Building Next Generation Connected and Distributed Applications Using Indigo, IIS7, Peer-to-Peer, and More
• A Lap Around Indigo
• Indigo: Under the Hood
• IIS7: What's New in Hosting and Extensibility
• InfoCard in a Nutshell
• Enhancing Applications with Real Time Communication Platforms
• Building P2P Applications Using Longhorn's New PeerNet APIs
• Indigo Extensibility: How to Write an Indigo Transport Channel
• Writing Interoperable Indigo Services

</extract>

for all of the currently available/published details you can go to this link.

Ciao,
Paul

Tuesday, June 07, 2005 5:05:52 PM UTC |  | Disclaimer | Comments [0] | 

can be found at http://msdn.microsoft.com/launch2005/

Enjoy!

-Paul

also the offical announcement for the launch date (the week of the 7th of Nov.) of  Visual Studio 2005, SQL Server 2005 and Biztalk 2006 can be found at this link

Tuesday, June 07, 2005 3:09:50 PM UTC |  | Disclaimer | Comments [0] | 

Its looks like the week starting the 7th of Nov. is the big launch for Visual Studio 2005, SQL Server 2005 and Biztalk 2006. Cool!!

The details were announced this morning at TechEd.

details via, offical MS press release

Tuesday, June 07, 2005 3:00:08 PM UTC |  | Disclaimer | Comments [0] | 

This cropped in a discussion around some community work we are doing here in Ireland and I was a bit stumped as to how best to decribe the Infocard technology, as I only have a very vague recollection as to what is it etc….

Being the hoarder of web links that I am, I knew I had some bookmarks to it somewhere.

Sure enough I do, Tim Sneath gives a nice overview and of course Kim Camerons blog (one of the archs of Infocard) is a very useful resource.

Also you have a number of papers on MSDN that cover this in more detail, such as Microsoft's Vision for an Identity Metasystem.

And of course you can play with the bits in the avalon and indigo beta 1 RC.

– Paul

Saturday, June 04, 2005 3:16:35 PM UTC |  | Disclaimer | Comments [0] | 

The CTP of WSE 3.0 is out. You can get the download at this link and the release notes here.

Also some new HOL’s for messaging and security have been released, these can be found here and here

updates and new features include

<extract>

New Features for Version 3.0

• The introduction of Turnkey Security Scenarios that provide high level security building blocks that enable you to secure messaging patterns (such as request/response) rather than having to consider how to secure the request and response independently. These Turnkey Security Scenarios, otherwise known as security assertions, are best practices when securing end to end messages.
• Improved Policy Framework

• The Policy format has been simplified to reflect the Turnkey Security Scenarios. Policy still allows configuration-based declaration of security requirements for incoming and outgoing SOAP messages, but now concentrates on where to get the security tokens from based upon the chosen security assertion.
• CLR attribute based programming. Policy files can now be associated with a client proxy or a service via a Policy attribute i.e. [Policy("ServerPolicy")]
• Imperative and declarative programming models for policy have been aligned to provide uniform programming abstractions. In WSE 2.0 there was no correlation between the code written to secure a message exchange and declarative policy files. In WSE 3.0 through the use of the CLR Policy attribute and the SetPolicy method on WSE generated client proxies (via Visual Studio's Add Web Reference) policy files can now be used in code to secure a client or a service.
• Policy also allows significant extensibility mechanisms for user-defined policies in code. By extending the Microsoft.Web.Services3.Design.PolicyAssertion class to create your own policy assertion, custom transformations of the SoapEnvelope can be performed at any stage in the pipeline. For example this enables you to define a logging assertion or have a policy assertion that enforces specified XML schemas for message validation. The same assertion can then be used in the declarative policy file.
• An updated Security Settings Wizard that helps secure an application by generating a policy. The Security Settings Wizard also now reflects the Turnkey Security Scenarios when securing an application and walks you through the best choice of Policy assertion based upon your chosen security deployment.

• ASP.NET Web services, otherwise known as ASMX Web services, can now be hosted outside of IIS, for example in console applications or NT services and called with the TCP/IP protocol. The existing lightweight, message-oriented, SOAP programming model SoapSender/ SoapReceiver classes remain.
• Support for the W3C MTOM Recommendation to enable large amounts of binary data to be sent efficiently and securely.
• Improved session management when using WS-SecureConversation and Security Context Tokens (SCTs). SCTs can now contain the original client authentication token when sent from the client to the service, which enable sessions to be re-established if lost e.g. when a service's appdomain is reset. This provides reliability for the session and enables sessions to be used in web farm scenarios.
• WS-SecureConversation sessions can now be cancelled explicitly.
• Integrated tool support with Visual Studio 2005 Beta 2. The WSE 3.0 configuration tool can be accessed via the context menu on the Visual Studio 2005 Solution Explorer.
• Support for 64 bit runtime.
• Support for updated Web services specifications including WS-Addressing, WS-Security, WS-Trust, and WS-SecureConversation. 
• Updated QuickStart samples.
• See the documentation for more information.

</extract> 

note the MTOM support and ASMX without hosting in IIS, pretty cool stuff. Also the “stateful” SCT is very useful, especially when scaling out across a web farm. Also this is the WSE version that is going to have wire interop with Indigo. Its based on all of the Whidbey goodness and going by comments that mfussell has on his blog it will ship at Whidbey RTM + 4 weeks.

Enjoy!

Saturday, June 04, 2005 2:51:38 PM UTC |  | Disclaimer | Comments [2] | 

Just spotted this at Volker’s blog, AMD and MS are doing a tech tour together. Unfortunately, it seems the tour is only for the US market

Anyway, if you happen to be in the US, this should be well worth attending. The details can be found at http://cs.silverpop.com/amd/tech_tour/2005/registration_site1.htm

Wednesday, June 01, 2005 10:01:27 PM UTC |  | Disclaimer | Comments [0] | 

The new architecture resource center was launched on Microsoft.com yesterday. You can find it at this link.

Also you can find details on the upcoming certified architect programme.

– Paul

Wednesday, June 01, 2005 12:41:44 PM UTC |  | Disclaimer | Comments [0] | 

David Chappell has published an update to his early introduction to Indigo. The link to the updated article can be found at here

The paper is a great read, but what I find most interesting is the section entitled “Illustrating the Problem: A Scenario”.

When giving an example of solutions that leverage SO, my perference is to use solutions in the GDS/Travel industry vertical. When I have used the “new economy” example or a financial instuition example, I have found that it does not resonate well with everyone. What I have found is that folks sometimes feel that it protrays that a solution has to be a certain size and/or it applies to only certain vertical types.

So in the search for a example that seems to work the best (for me at least), I have tried using more local and specific examples, such as Reach or the UK’s Government Gateway. Since I typically draw a blank with many folks when I ask them if they know about the Reach project, the idea of using them got quickly canned.  

For me, the GDS/Travel vertical provides many of the best examples and resonates the best with folks. I don’t know of anyone that does not know of a travel web application, whether it be a web application for a flight carrier, hotel and/or car rental company and it seems that most folks know most/all of the big 4 GDS systems.

The other qualities I also like about this example is that you can depict the variations in size, scale and dimensions at so many different levels and still mantain fidelity. For example, the GDS/Travel industry is composed of iterative constellations of service providers which are a blending/composite of product/business/service lines from other service providers. SO fidelity is maintained by the solutions offered, being fractal in nature as well as being autonomous. The final quality of the example that I like, is that it explicily calls out that a service provider can be of any size, from a “Mom & Pop” hotel to an international Hotel chain, with the only requirement being that the service offered by the provider be distributed (over time and space).

Wednesday, June 01, 2005 12:28:06 PM UTC |  | Disclaimer | Comments [0] |